The Berwyn Mountain UFO
Crash - A British Roswell?
In 1958 author
Gavin Gibbons wrote By Space
Ship to the Moon, a sci-fi book which featured a UFO landing on
the Berwyn mountains in Wales. Sixteen years later, in 1974, those same
mountains would again be the focus for a story involving a downed UFO.
But this time, some said, the story was for real.
The Berwyn Mountains run south west to north east across central North
Wales, separating Shropshire from the Snowdonia National Park. They have
a long history of human habitation. Prehistoric man lived and worshipped
on the mountains, leaving behind a dramatic ritual landscape to which
many strange beliefs have become attached. UFOs are not new to the area
either. Local folklore tells us that these peaks have been haunted by a
multitude of aerial phenomena, including the spectral Hounds of Hell
whilst to the south, at Llanrhaedr-y-Mochnant, the villagers were once
plagued by ‘flying dragons’ - a common historical name for UFOs.
Contemporary paranormal puzzles abound too and besides UFOs include
‘phantom bombers’, ghosts and lake monsters. The region is also the lair
of that most modern of mysteries the ‘alien big cat’.
Although popular as a tourist destination in summer the Berwyn Mountains
can be highly dangerous and mountain rescue teams are frequently called
out to search for the lost and injured.
The highest peak, Cader Berwyn, rises to 827 metres and several
aeroplanes, both military and civilian, have crashed on its slopes in
poor visibility over the past fifty years. In winter the area is
especially remote, often snow-covered, and dark for over twelve hours a
day. An ideal spot, if ever there was one, for a UFO landing.
It is against this backdrop that an incident took place on 23 January
1974 which at first perplexed locals and later the UFO community. The
events spawned a cascade of rumours which has led some UFO investigators
to conclude that an extraterrestrial craft crashed on Cader Berwyn.
These same ufologists also claimed that the alien crew, some still
living, were immediately whisked off to a secret military installation
in the south of England for study and that the whole fantastic business
has been hushed up by the UK government. The Berwyn Mountain Incident
has been described as ‘...the best example of a UFO retrieval in
Britain’, and likened to the Roswell and Rendlesham events.
A preposterous claim? Certainly. One easily dismissed by those with
little or no knowledge of the case. But there is no smoke without fire
and even the most bizarre story must have its genesis in truth, no
matter how mundane or exotic that truth may be.
Imagine for a moment the consequences if aliens really
had fallen to earth
that night in January 1974? If this speculation could be proved then we
would know with certainty we were not alone in the universe. The
possibilities and consequences of such an event are awesome. Such proof
would also demonstrate that the government had been keeping The Greatest
Story Never Told hidden from us. Proof of a genuine UFO crash on Cader
Berwyn would blow the lid on the alleged world wide UFO cover-up.
But if it can be argued that there was no alien craft, then just what
does lie behind the longevity and tenacity of these persistent claims?
Could it have been the crash of a secret military test craft such as one
of the ‘flying triangles’ which have dominated ufo-lore throughout the
1990s? Or perhaps a failed missile test from the rocketry range at
nearby Aberporth? A hoax even? Or something far more complicated. And if
it is any of these then why have the claims of UFOs, alien cadavers and
military cover-ups persisted for over twenty five years?
Comparisons with Roswell and other UFO crash retrieval events show the
Berwyn Incident to have many of the same components and motifs and
therefore to be worthy of in-depth study. Yet whilst rumours of this
crash have been in existence for a quarter of a century it has only
recently drawn any serious attention from the UFO community. And
although dramatic claims have been made no-one had investigated this
potentially remarkable case in any great depth. The Berwyn Incident, far
from proven, was a kaleidoscope of rumour and fact concerning crashed
UFOs, alien bodies, military retrieval teams, earth tremors, meteorites,
weapons testing, disinformation agents, Men In Black and geologically
created lights.
The story is a complex one
and I have pieced together a composite account from statements and
articles by witnesses, informants, ufologists and newspapers of what
allegedly happened on and around January 23rd 1974.
This is ‘the story’, the generally accepted account, variations
on which have become enshrined in the UFO literature and which has
seeped out into the public’s consciousness. It is closely referenced so
that the reader can check the origins of these claims.
Prior to the Berwyn Incident the north of England, had been plagued by
an aerial phenomenon dubbed the ‘phantom helicopter’. Over a hundred
good sightings were made of this anomalous object which was seen flying
low at night, often over dangerous terrain and in appalling weather.
These sightings largely took place between spring 1973 and spring 1974
and ceased, coincidentally or curiously, immediately after the Berwyn
Incident. Despite the numerous sightings and keen police interest, which
led to a still-secret official report, no one explanation was ever
found. But something,
was flying around the northern skies and many of the witnesses concurred
that whatever it was, ‘it seemed to be looking for something’.[]
Wednesday the 23rd of January 1974 was just another day in Bala and the
nearby villages of Corwen, Llandrillo and Llanderfel. UFOs were the last
thing on the villagers’ minds as Britain huddled in the depths of winter
and the recently introduced three day week. But as night closed in an
event took place which was to change all that.
Just after 8.30pm thousands of people in the area were jolted from their
winter musings by at least one, possibly two, explosions, followed
immediately by a terrible rumbling. The whole event lasted four or five
seconds. Furniture moved, ornaments rattled, buildings shook. Livestock
and domestic animals voiced their terror. As people shot to their
windows some saw lights streaking across the sky. Villagers flooded out
into the streets in an attempt to discover the cause of the violent
disturbance. As they looked up into the mountains several saw a
mysterious white glow, lasting a few seconds. Others saw beams of light
being projected into the night sky.[]
Many villagers immediately called the emergency services believing that
a disaster of some kind had taken place. After speaking to the police
one local nurse was certain that an aircraft had crashed and set off for
the mountains in her car, dreading what she might find there, but eager
to offer help until the emergency services arrived. Once above the tree
line and on the high mountain road she stopped her car, baffled and
startled at what she could see. For there, high on the desolate mountain
side, was what appeared to be a large glowing sphere. Whatever it was
lay too far from the road to be reached on foot and all the nurse could
do was watch. The sphere seemed to pulsate, changing colour as it did so
from red to yellow to white, while other white lights, ‘fairy lights’ as
the witness described them, could be seen above and below it on the
hillside. Realising she could not possibly reach the lights she drove
back to her village. As she
did so a group of police and soldiers stopped her and forcefully ordered
her off the mountain, saying the road was being cordoned off.[]
Official reaction was quick to the initial explosion. Suspiciously quick
some say, with more police and military arriving within minutes, turning
people away from the mountain roads. In the days following it seems
there was an unusual and large military presence in the area. Roads
remained closed and farmers reported they were forbidden from tending
their stock. Something
was obviously being sought, or why would military jets and helicopters
be criss-crossing the area and strangers combing the mountainsides?
Scientists from university departments also came to tramp the hills, but
far more suspicious were the official-looking outsiders who turned up in
the villages immediately after the event, tight-lipped about their
business but keenly interested in the events on the mountain.[]
The incident was immediately taken seriously by the media, with national
TV and radio reports being broadcast over several days.
The Guardian,
The Times and other
national newspapers gave the event in-depth coverage as did the Welsh
regional and local press.[]
Speculation about the cause of the explosion, rumbling and lights was
rife. An aircraft crash would have accounted for the noise, lights and
keen official involvement. Indeed one local newspaper was certain that
whatever had taken place involved a crash of some kind and that
something had been retrieved from the mountains, noting, ‘There is a
report that an Army vehicle was seen coming down the mountain near Bala
Lake with a large square box on the back of it and accompanied by
outriders.’[]. But the authorities steadfastly refused to acknowledge
that anything unusual had taken place. And in any case, not one of the
‘explanations’ took into account the
totality of what had
been reported by witnesses.
Meteorites and earth tremors were also suggested as being the cause, and
indeed would have explained
some of the mystery. But what could possibly explain the ‘glows’
and ‘beams of light’ seen on the mountain? They were swiftly dismissed
as the villagers’ imaginations, shooting stars, or more ludicrously as
people out poaching hares. Natural phenomena was also unlikely to lead
to roads being closed by the army or large areas of mountain side being
closed off.
With no further information coming to light the media soon forgot about
the incident. The locals too let the matter fade from their immediate
concern if not entirely from their memories. UFO researchers realised
that something had
taken place which had not been satisfactorily explained. Lights in the
sky, and mysterious explosions, together with unusual military activity
are avidly noted by the UFO community. However, in 1974 UFO crash
retrievals were barely mentioned in the UFO literature, especially in
the UK, and there was no immediate template for the events in the
Berwyn’s to fit into. Various UFO journals reported the events at the
time but no investigation was undertaken and no real conclusions were
offered.
But shadowy forces appeared to be at work. Within months of the event
UFO investigators in the north of England began to receive
official-looking documents from a group called Aerial Phenomena Enquiry
Network (APEN). These documents claimed that an extraterrestrial craft
had come down on the
Berwyns and was retrieved for study by an APEN crash retrieval team
which had been on the scene within hours of the event. More
significantly APEN claimed there had been a key witness to the UFO crash
who they were recommending for hypnotic regression. Hypnotic regression
was at that time virtually unknown in the UK UFO community. In fact
besides having being used in the 1961 Betty and Barney Hill ‘abduction’,
hypnosis was not used within ufology at that time.
If APEN were hoaxers
then they displayed an uncanny and detailed knowledge of both ufology in
general and the Berwyn Mountain incident in particular. Some researchers
have speculated that APEN may have been part of a government cover up,
using UFO mythology to spread disinformation and so divert attention
from secret weapons testing. APEN also issued similar enigmatic
communications in conjunction with other UFO events, notably the
Rendlesham Forest case.[]
The Berwyn Incident lay largely dormant throughout most of the 1970s and
80s, being little more than a footnote in the literature. But intriguing
pieces of information did surface, later becoming part of the lore
surrounding the case. Jenny Randles was a frequent visitor to the region
in the late 1970s. staying in the Llandrillo area for weeks at a time.
She recalls the locals speaking to her about military activity on the
mountains in the wake of some form of crash-like event. Jenny was very
interested in the case and initially put it down to a possible
‘earthlight’.
In Paul Devereux’ book Places of Power, he briefly relates the Berwyn
Incident, attributing the cause of the odd lights seen on and above the
mountain to geophysical stresses. Known as ‘Earthlights’ to ufologists
these are literally lights formed by Earth. Devereux notes that a
colleague, Keith Critchlow, was in the area several days after the
incident and ‘fell in with scientists who were investigating the
mountain’. They had a geiger counter with them which allegedly gave
extraordinary readings in the vicinity of a Bronze Age archaeological
site known as Moel ty Uchaf, on the slopes of Cader Berwyn[].
The 1990s brought growing interest in the UFO subject and the Berwyn
Incident was recalled. Jenny Randles lectured on the case at the 1994
Fortean Times UnConvention and mentioned the anomalous radiation count
at the Moel ty Uchaf circle. Following her lecture she was approached by
a science correspondent from the Sunday Express. He mentioned rumours of
a leukaemia cluster among children in the Bala area which had arisen in
the years following the Berwyn Incident. At the time he connected it
with possible leaks from the Trawsfynedd nuclear power station but could
not prove this. In the light of later claims of UFO crashes or secret
military hardware it could be implied that whatever had crashed had
possibly been radioactive in nature and of sufficient strength to affect
the human organism.[]
By 1996 the Berwyn Incident had featured in UFO books, several UFO
magazines and national newspapers. Television programmes on Channel 4
and the Discovery Channel covered the case, and by 1997 it was the focus
of an entire chapter in Nick Redfern’s best-selling book about the
government cover-up of UFO information,
A Covert Agenda[].
The Berwyn incident was big news once again. From its humble beginnings
it was now a ‘British Roswell’ just waiting to burst, firmly enshrined
in ufo-lore as one of the United Kingdom’s few UFO crash retrieval
cases. This surge of publicity brought forward new witnesses whose
testimony added new and dramatic dimensions to the case.
In an article for UFO Magazine,
veteran ufologist Tony Dodd recounted how his anonymous informant was
part of a military unit put on stand-by several days
before the date of the
Berwyn Incident. His unit was moved northwards through North Wales until
he and four others were sent to the village of Llanderfel to collect
‘two large, oblong boxes’. They were ordered to take these to Porton
Down in Wiltshire. Once at Porton Down, a UK government research
establishment, the boxes were opened and Dodd’s informant told him: ‘We
were shocked to see two creatures which had been placed inside
contamination suits. When the suits were fully opened it was obvious the
creatures were clearly not of this world and when examined were found to
be dead. What I saw in the boxes that day changed my whole concept of
life.’ Dodd’s informant goes on to relate details of the creatures; ‘The
bodies were about five to six feet tall, humanoid in shape but so thin
they looked almost skeletal with covered skin.’
The military man did not actually see a crashed UFO himself but claimed
that: ‘Sometime later we joined up with the other elements of our unit,
who informed us that they had also transported bodies of ‘alien beings’
to Porton Down, but said their cargo was still alive.’[]
This interest by the media, together with the claims made by researchers
Jenny Randles, Nick Redfern, Tony Dodd and Margaret Fry led to me
re-investigating the Berwyn Incident in 1998. There was a wealth of
information available and I reasoned that somewhere, amid the accounts
of the witnesses and the claims of the ufologists, lay the key to what
really happened on that January night in 1974.
Ufologists, particularly those who believe that there is a global
conspiracy to conceal evidence of extraterrestrial visitation are keen
to stress the importance of the ‘paper trail’. By this they mean that
any event, however secret, must have generated some official
documentation, and that by finding this documentation clues as to what
happened can be gleaned. It seemed reasonable that an event of the
magnitude of the Berwyn Incident would have left at least
some trace in official
records, no matter how small or obscure. But those ufologists who had
pursued the case up to 1997 had not followed this line of enquiry,
claiming that either the documentation no longer existed or was part of
the cover-up. They clearly hadn’t looked hard enough, because I found a
wealth of official documentation from
a variety of sources. I used it, together with witness
statements, to piece together the true events of January 23rd 1974.
What follows is the results of that re-investigation.
In A Covert Agenda Nick
Redfern suggested that the numerous ‘phantom helicopters’, seen in the
months leading up to the Berwyn Incident, were flown by military UFO
crash retrieval teams. Redfern also claimed they had received advance
knowledge of a UFO landing and were on permanent standby, suggesting
that ‘Perhaps the idea of a joint CIA-Ministry of Defence project
designed to respond on a quick reaction basis to UFO incidents should be
considered...’.[]
But the phantom helicopter story is a red-herring. Although a number of
people had described the phenomenon as a ‘helicopter’, a motif quickly
seized upon by the media, most witnesses were in fact describing an
unknown light of many
shapes and colours. The ‘phantom helicopter’ was more Unidentified
Aerial Phenomenon than Unidentified Flying Object - a big difference.
Some genuine helicopters were proved to be responsible for some
sightings, but the rest remained unexplained. Additionally, the
phenomena was not seen in the Bala area and there is no real connection
between the ‘phantom helicopters’ and the Berwyn Incident other than the
circumstantial link made by Nick Redfern. During my research into the
Berwyn Incident I discussed this in some depth with Nick Redfern and he
still stands by his published link between the ‘phantom helicopter’ and
the Berwyn Incident. But in correspondence he qualified his belief with
‘All I was really trying to do was get people thinking about what
might have taken place
- nothing more.’[]
January 23rd 1974 was a strange night by anyone’s standards. In
retrospect it was one of those evenings when nature was staging a
son et lumiere display
on a scale rarely seen. Witnesses in the villages surrounding the Berwyn
Mountains reported seeing a great deal in of aerial phenomena that
night. Besides the odd lights seen on the mountain itself their reports
and those of the media describe at least four incandescent balls of
light which streaked across the Welsh skies between 7.30 and 10.00pm
that night. These sightings have been seized upon by ufologists with the
implication being that what was seen were UFOs, at least one of which
crashed or landed on Cader Berwyn. To the villagers of north Wales they
were UFOs -literally
Unidentified Flying Objects - and they described them in terms which
make them sound highly unusual.
One farmer described what he saw in these terms:
‘I saw this object coming along the mountain, about the size of a bus
really, white in the middle, it came across the mountain and dipped. I
thought it was going to crash.’[]
A dramatic description which certainly sounds like a many UFO accounts.
But there is a rational explanation for Farmer Williams’ sighting and
all the other aerial phenomena seen that evening.
Records kept by the Astronomy Department at Leicester University, among
other places, show that a number of outstanding bolide meteors were
seen that night. These coincided with the approximate times given
by witnesses in north Wales. The first was at 7.25pm, followed by
another at 8.15pm. The third, at 8.30pm, co-incided with the centrepiece
of the evening’s events. And yet another, the most dramatic of all, was
seen at 9.55pm. Bolide meteors are considerable brighter and longer
lived than ordinary ‘shooting stars’. They can appear to be very low,
depending on the position of the witness, and often trail ‘sparks’ of
blue and green across the sky. Bolide meteors are responsible for many
misperceptions of UFOs and even fool the emergency services who are
often called out to ‘plane crashes only to discover the witnesses had
seen a bright bolide meteor.
At exactly 8.38pm the Bala area was rocked by a huge explosion, closely
followed by a deep rumbling. One witness recalled it as being ‘like a
lorry running into a house’. Crockery rattled, furniture moved and walls
rippled slightly. Some people were certain it was a plane crash on the
mountains. Other, older residents of the area, recalled earth tremors of
the past and assumed it was the latest in a series of such disturbances
which have taken place along the geological rift know as the Bala Fault.
This is the primary incident which has subsequently caused many UFO
investigators, and the readers of their books and articles, to suggest
and believe that a UFO crashed. In effect they are saying that the noise
heard and impact felt was the UFO impacting on Cader Berwyn. The crashed
UFO story however only came out years
after the event. At the
time confusion reigned as to what had caused the impact.
Because of reports of lights in the sky that evening, it was initially
thought that a meteorite had impacted on the Berwyns. Many people across
North Wales claimed to have seen a light in the sky ‘trailing sparks’.
But this was seen at 8.30pm, eight minutes before the explosion, and
witness descriptions indicate that it was yet another bright fireball
meteor. Nonetheless in the minds of many it has become conflated with
the ‘explosion’ to create evidence of a crash.
The explosion was heard only in the Bala area but the tremor was felt as
far away as Liverpool. By 2pm on the 24th January seismologists had
determined the explosion and tremor were caused by an earthquake of 4-5
on the Richter scale. It’s epicentre was the Bala area at a depth of
eight kilometres. To cause a reading of that magnitude, a solid object -
meteorite or UFO - would have weighed several hundred tons and left a
massive crater. Therefore, unless a UFO had crashed at the
exact moment of an
earth tremor, it can be
safely assumed that the explosion and rumblings were the result of a
purely natural process.
Following the explosion Llandrillo district nurse Pat Evans ran out into
the village street. She saw no lights but the explosion and the accounts
of other villagers convinced her that something had crashed on the
mountains. It took her a while to get through to the police as the
‘phone lines were jammed with 999 calls, but eventually she spoke to
Colwyn Bay police HQ. They suggested it could have been a ‘plane crash
so she bundled her two young daughters into the car and set off up the
mountain, intending to offer help until the emergency services arrived.
As Mrs Evans reached the point where the B4391 mountain road levels out
she was puzzled by what appeared to be a large illuminated ball of light
on the hillside. Unable to identify it was she drove on for a few
minutes before returning to the same spot. The light was still there so
she parked and observed it for a while. A light drizzle was falling but
the night was otherwise clear and Mrs Evans was able to describe the
ball as ‘large’, and forming a ‘perfect circle’. But it didn’t appear to
be three dimensional. In an interview she recalled, ‘There were no
flames shooting or anything like that. It was very uniform, round in
shape...it was a flat round...’. As she watched in puzzlement the light
changed colour several times from red to yellow to white. Smaller
lights, ‘fairy lights’ in Mrs Evans’ words, could be seen nearby.
It was too far away to reach on foot and so she returned home to
bed.[]
Many ufologists who have written about the Berwyn Incident have claimed
that Mrs Evans was turned back from the mountain by soldiers and police.
This is untrue and arose from a misunderstanding when she was first
interviewed by ufologists. Pat Evans is furious that she has been
misrepresented in this way and stated unequivocally to me in 1998 that
she saw ‘not a living soul’ on the mountain that night. More importantly
a letter from her exists, pre-dating any
interview, noting that she saw no-one. This fact is significant
because the misreporting of Mrs Evans’ experience has lent credence to
claims that a crash retrieval team was on the mountain shortly after the
explosion.
Nonetheless what
the nurse saw on the slopes of Cader Berwyn was still crucial to any
explanation of the case and I wanted further evidence untainted by time
or ufologists. For that evidence I turned to records kept by the British
Geological Survey in Edinburgh. The BGS records, untouched for twenty
four years, revealed that within days of the explosion a team of
investigators had been sent to the Bala area. This, incidentally, is
almost certainly the source of rumours of ‘officials’ who came to the
area, stayed in local hotels and questioned villagers closely about the
event. That is exactly what the BGS field team did. A total of six
interviewers came to the area and conducted door to door enquiries about
the event. This is the procedure by which the BGS investigates earth
tremors and earth quakes. These interviewers worked to a set
questionnaire which asked questions such as ‘Were you at all alarmed or
frightened?’, and ‘Did you hear any creaking noises?’. These and similar
questions must have seemed quite odd to the locals especially when asked
by a team of outsiders who just arrived from nowhere. Over two hundred
witnesses were interviewed. Nurse Pat Evans was one of them.
The BGS field notes were enlightening. Most ufologists have always
assumed that Pat Evans must have been on the mountain almost immediately
after the explosion. They use this assumption to argue that the lights
she saw surrounding the anomalous red lights she saw must have been from
a pre-alerted crash retrieval team as no-one else could have got on the
mountain so quickly after the ‘crash’.
But the BGS records from her 1974 interview are very specific about time
and say she, ‘left house during ‘Till Death’....’. I took ‘Till Death’
to be a reference to the popular TV sit-com ‘Til Death Us Do Part and
checked the TV schedules. Sure enough, ‘Til Death Us Do Part had started
at 9.30pm that night. ‘Til Death.... was the only post-8.30pm sit-com
that evening. Knowing that the Evans’ left the house after 9.30pm means
she would have observed the anomalous light sometime after 9.40pm, an
hour later than previously thought. That hour’s difference is crucial.
Meanwhile, 14 year old farmer’s son Huw Thomas was also watching TV that
night. At about 9.20pm he answered the door to find several policemen in
the farm yard. They wanted to commandeer the farm Landrover, saying a
‘plane had crashed up on the mountain. Thomas’ parents were out so, with
his neighbour Enoch driving, they set off up a track leading to the
mountain, other police following in a car. As they neared the
mountain-gate they had to waste valuable time moving a car which blocked
the road. Huw Thomas recognised the car as belonging to local poachers.
Once through the mountain gate several policemen spread out on
foot with torches, whilst the Landrover and police car drove slowly up
the track.[]
The time it took Huw Thomas to speak to the police, load the landrover,
drive up to the mountain and move a car from the road would place the
police search team on the lower slopes of Cader Berwyn at about 9.40pm.
The BGS also interviewed one of the poachers whose car Huw Thomas had
moved. This interview confirmed their time and position and states that
the poachers ‘carried on work for 45 minutes (after the explosion) and
were almost back at the car when met party (police etc) coming up.’[]
Huw Thomas, now a farmer in his own right, confirmed this meeting in a
1998 interview.[]
That the search party comprising of police and farmers met the poachers
as they went up the mountain is further backed up by other BGS
materials. Besides interviews the BGS records also contained an Ordnance
Survey map on which important witness locations and sightings of lights
were plotted. This map was a revelation. It showed the anomalous light
seen by the nurse, the location of the poachers and the police search
party to be all in the same
small area of hillside. And as already noted the times given to
the BGS by all three parties place them there
at the same time.
The logic and conclusion is inescapable. Neither Huw Thomas nor the
police saw the light seen by the nurse. Conversely the nurse
did see the police,
though she didn’t realise it at the time. The drawing on her BGS notes
clearly shows and describes ‘vehicles’ and ‘torch lights’. This was the
search party. Between them, very close to both, is the anomalous light
source. Whatever she was seeing
must have been visible
to the search team and the poachers. So either the farmer and police
lied about what they saw to the BGS in 1974 and myself in 1998, or it
wasn’t noteworthy at the time.
But what was it? Well, there is one possibility which would account for
it. The BGS notes also confirmed the poachers were using powerful lamps
made from car spotlamps powered by car batteries. Pat Evans recalls the
weather was clear but drizzling. Lights seen in those conditions can
appear to change colour and size by refraction and to ‘glow’. As for the
size, which she described as larger than vehicle lights, this may be a
perceptual trick. Remember that Nurse Evans was looking across a dark
mountainside with no visual points of reference and expecting to see a
‘plane crash or some other scene of devastation. On the evidence
available it is certain that the nurse saw the poachers with their
lamping lights at the point they met and talked to the police.
Some ufologists claim that although bolide meteors
were seen throughout
the evening, the beams of light seen on the mountain immediately after
the explosion were not astronomical in origin and were connected to the
UFO crash. Several of the BGS notes refer to people seeing these beams
‘on the brow’ of the hill, ’sometimes on and sometimes off but always
vertically into sky’. Another witness saw one beam ‘processing about the
vertical’. These accounts were puzzling until I looked closely at the
locations of the witnesses.
All the witnesses who reported seeing these ‘light beams’ were in the
village of Llandrillo at the time. The land rises sharply to the south
and to an observer in the village the ‘brow of the hill’ is not the
summit ridge of the Berwyns (actually over three miles away), but the
plateau area around the 548m point. The exact area in fact where the
poachers with lamps were. The BGS records note the poachers, ‘continued
work for half an hour to forty five minutes’ after the 8.38pm earth
tremor, and it was early in this time period the beams were seen. Some
villagers were convinced that poachers lamps couldn’t be responsible for
the beams, others not so sure. One witness told the BGS he had seen the
poacher’s lights on previous occasions and they were exactly the same as
the beams seen that night.
This theory may appear to be debunking or to be twisting the facts to
fit a theory. But we must use logic and probability in solving any case
and the facts are that poachers with powerful lamps were in the
exact area where the
beams of light were seen. When questioned by the police the poachers
claimed their lamps were not responsible, that they had kept them
trained on the ground. Yet they also said they had not seen anything
unusual. It’s reasonable to suggest that as the poachers and their
bright lamps were in the same location as the beams of light seen from
Llandrillo, it was their lights people were seeing and misperceiving.
Perhaps because of excitement caused by the earth tremor, perhaps
because of belief in a crash of some kind.
The poachers had very good reason for not wishing to own up to causing
bright beams of light in the sky as it was reports of ‘light beams’
which partially led the police to believe an aircraft had crashed.
However there were a
very small number of genuinely unexplained lights seen that evening. One
witness opened her curtains immediately after the tremor to see a ‘big
bright glow in the sky over the brow of the hill’. Another saw a ‘glow
several times brighter than the sun’ to the south east which ‘came and
went’. Maria Williams of Llandrillo saw this white glow at the same time
as the poacher’s lights. Some scientists have suggested this short-lived
white glow was caused as a result of the huge tectonic stresses involved
in the earth-tremor. An earthlight. But witnesses to this were few. And
as it was seen at the same time as a bright meteor and the poacher’s
lights, it may well be yet another misperception. Indeed one witness
described the ‘glow’ as ‘twinkling....like a streetlamp seen through
heavy rain’, just how a bright lamp would appear.
Claims by ufologists that a military presence was on the scene
immediately following the 8.38pm explosion and in subsequent days also
bear close examination. As we’ve already seen nurse Pat Evans, by her
own admission, was not stopped by soldiers or police and saw no-one out
on the mountain roads. She set off at 7.00am for work the following day
and saw nothing unusual in the village. So how did stories of a massive
police and military presence arise? To understand that we need to return
again to the official records.
Following the 8.38pm earth tremor the police opened a Major Incident
Log. This log shows that the police initially thought a ‘plane had
crashed and Fire and Ambulance services were put on stand-by. At 9.09pm
the police contacted RAF Valley Mountain Rescue Team (VMRT) based at
Valley on Anglesey some seventy five miles away. A three man team left
Valley at 9.20pm and, arrived at Llandrillo at 00.10am.
The VMRT log lists the incident as ‘Unidentified lights and noise
on hillside’ and comments, ‘VMRT requested to investigate lights and
noise on hillside. Advance party covered relevant area with negative
results. Incident produced much local excitement.’ The fact that VMRT
only deemed it necessary to send a three man team argues strongly
against the event being of any significance. On their arrival in
Llandrillo the mountain rescue team consulted with local police who
suggested they wait until morning before initiating a search.
At 7.00am on 24th January VMRT, together with local police, searched the
mountains. They found nothing and abandoned the search at 2.15pm,
possibly following official notification that the ‘explosion’ had been
caused by an earth tremor. Neither the police or VMRT logs mention any
military involvement other than the RAF Mountain Rescue Team. Farmer’s
son Huw Thomas was again out on the Berwyns that day, acting as guide
for Ron Madison, a scientist who was working on the theory that a
meteorite may have impacted. Madison and Thomas recall seeing no-one
else on the mountain other than the police and VMRT. The intense media
interest however led to various helicopters flying over the area
throughout the week and Ron Madison used his contacts at RAF Valley to
overfly the area in a plane to take a series of photographs.[]
But this low level of official activity wouldn’t account for reports of
closed and guarded roads, the military presence, or for the aircraft and
twin engined ‘copters seen overhead. Looking at the paper trail, none of
the police, Mountain Rescue Team or British Geological Survey documents
from 1974 mention this alleged military activity. In fact the only
contemporary record of a military presence comes from the article in the
Border Counties Advertiser which is the source of rumours of bodies
being brought off the mountain. In looking for an explanation to this
component of the story there are two crucial factors.
Firstly, none of the Berwyn Mountain Incident witnesses were formally
interviewed by ufologists until at least twenty years after the event.
And secondly there had been at least one other event in the locality
which contained all those elements. On 12th February 1982 an RAF Harrier
jet carrying top-secret equipment crashed on Cader Berwyn. The RAF
descended on the area in force, using Gazelle and Wessex helicopters,
together with Harrier and Hercules planes, in the search. The tiny
village of Llandrillo was the centre for this activity and was alive
with RAF trucks and personnel for several days. The crash site was
sealed off and guarded until the wreckage could be removed. Additionally
there was another crash of a military ‘plane, also carrying top secret
equipment on the same mountain in 1972, two years before the alleged UFO
crash. Again the area was sealed of with a large military presence. It
is almost certain that these incidents, at the same time of year on the
same mountain, were conflated with the 1974 events.
But, the believers in the crash of a genuine alien crash say, what about
the military informants who came out of the woodwork in 1996 claiming
intimate knowledge of and participation in the crash retrieval.
Initially this strand of the story seemed promising. After all when
ex-military men are speaking out surely there must be
something in their
story?
However these ‘military informants’ who contacted researchers Nick
Redfern, Margaret Fry and Tony Dodd did so only
after the story had
been in a 1996 issue of UFO
Magazine. They fuelled the controversy surrounding the story,
offering much speculation but no verifiable fact. Redfern has recently
told me that his informant’s telephone number is ‘dead’, whilst Dodd
refuses to expand on the identity or veracity of his contact. A close
reading of Dodd’s account throws up more questions than answers. If the
military had obtained aliens, alive or dead, would they really ferry
them by truck? Surely a helicopter would have been the fastest, most
efficient and secret form of transport.
Porton Down, the research establishment to which they were taken
would hardly compromise security or
contamination by opening the boxes in the presence of what were
essentially the ‘delivery boys’. Until these ufologists can back their
claims up with some substantial proof they remain unsubstantiated
anecdotes, interesting but inconsequential to the solution of the case.
These ‘revelations’ came also at a time when several UK ufologists were
being contacted by alleged ‘military sources’ offering secret
UFO-related information, none of which amounted to anything tangible.
Researcher Kevin McClure suggested that this was a well organised hoax,
basing his suppositions on the number of contacts made within a short
time-span and the absolute absence of hard proof.[] APEN, the
organisation which circulated pseudo-official documents following the
Berwyn Incident are widely regarded by most serious ufologists to have
been a hoax perpetrated by ufologists on ufologists. This sort of hoax
is not new to the UFO community, the most famous of the hoaxed documents
being the MJ-12 papers which fooled ufologists for over a decade.
Despite the wealth of evidence to the contrary, Jenny Randles is not
convinced that the Berwyn Incident is completely solved. She cites the
alleged anomalous radiation readings and the rumour of a leukaemia
cluster as possible evidence that the incident may have involved a
military accident involving perhaps a radioactive missile. Yet there are
problems with Jenny’s interpretation. The radiation readings taken at
the Moel ty Uchaf circle in 1974 were a one-off. To have any scientific
relevance at all a series of geiger counter readings prior and
subsequent to the 1974 event would be required.
As for the alleged leukaemia cluster there is no evidence to
support this. Enquiries at the records of the National Radiological
Protection Board, Greenpeace, a former radiation monitor at the
Trawsfynnyd Nuclear Power Station and the archives of local papers did
not reveal so much as a hint of a leukaemia cluster.
That’s where the Berwyn case stands in 1999. There are still a few loose
ends and uncertainties; the symmetry of any UFO case is rarely complete,
especially when it is not properly investigated for twenty five years.
But I think the account I have given is the best, dare I say it,
‘explanation’ for the disparate events which coalesced into the Berwyn
Mountain UFO Crash. Of
course, there are those who still to believe a UFO crashed and continue
to insist that documents have been falsified, that witnesses have been
misquoted and so on. That’s their prerogative and understandable in
light of the complexities of the case and the power of belief in the
extraterrestrial hypothesis.
My conclusions are based not on belief however but on the ‘paper trail’
left by police, RAF, VMRT and the BGS, and the pattern which has emerged
from studying those sources is largely consistent with witness reports.
So until some hard, consistent evidence is produced I think the notion
that an alien spacecraft crashed in the Berwyn mountains is redundant.
It’s hard to believe that a concatenation of prolific meteor activity,
an earth tremor and poaching activity could lead to the conclusion that
a UFO had crashed. It did, and sometimes - often - the truth about a UFO
case is far stranger than any fiction. Although I’ve been investigating
mysteries for twenty years every case teaches something new or
reinforces some basic principle. The Berwyn Mountain case taught me
(again!) never to trust material originated by ufologists, but to always
go back to source documents and witnesses, and try to reconcile the two.
It also taught me (again!) about the flaws of perception and of the care
needed in interpreting witness statements. However certain a witness may
seem memory often combines disparate events and speculation into a
convincing reality.
The indefatigable researcher and inspiration behind Fortean Times
magazine, Charles Fort, had much to say about the connections - or
non-connections - between earth tremors and meteorites.[] And it may be
that there are other,
deeper factors at work in the Berwyn Incident. Perhaps earth tremors and
bolide meteors are in some way connected by mechanisms at present
outside our understanding. Or perhaps extraterrestrials have learned how
to enter Earth’s atmosphere under cover of meteor showers, even
disguised as meteors.
The adventurous believer may even wish to accept that aliens may even
have prescience of earth tremors and be able to effect a landing at
exactly the same time. In lieu of hard facts the speculative
possibilities are as endless as they are futile. On the other hand it
could all be a gigantic cosmic coincidence, a tangle of belief and
wishful thinking from which ufologists have spun yet another saga in the
continuing extraterrestrial mythos.
Back
to top of page